Apple MacBookPro15,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 48% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemApple MacBookPro15,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-937A206F2EE63C01
Memory22.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '22 at 14:14
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User ISL-User
Background CPU 32%
CPU Throttled 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-8950HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Memory 72.8
1-Core 38.7
2-Core 78.8
42% 63.4 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 257
26% 213 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP1024 1TB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 127.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,143
Write 1,393
Mixed 875
254% 1,137 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 17.8
65% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 863
DQ Write 458
DQ Mixed 303
321% 541 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 30%
NORELSYS 1081CS0 64GB
57GB free, PID 1081
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 76 75 75 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 86.7
Write 76
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 71.3
100% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 5.3
351% 5.4 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATS2G64HZ-2G6B1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
61.8% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 21
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 13.8
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro15,1 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Apple MacBookPro15,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback