Lenovo 20FAS2YY00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 28% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20FAS2YY00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FAS2YY00
Memory11.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime21 Days
Run DateJun 15 '22 at 02:35
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 27%
CPU Throttled 28%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 71.5
1-Core 93.2
2-Core 154
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 270
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 253
16% 253 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 2233) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9865
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.14% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 7.1
5% 5.87 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.14%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9TN8W256G1001 256GB
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6117101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 192 194 196 193 194 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 426
Write 300
Mixed 249
SusWrite 202
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 24
90% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 55.9
DQ Mixed 77.9
64% 95.5 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD 20GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 15.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20FAS2YY00 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20FAS2YY00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback