Lenovo 20FAS20W00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.52% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 28% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20FAS20W00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FAS20W00
Memory16.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '19 at 01:10
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
CPU Throttled 28%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 89.6
2-Core 173
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 280
38% 280 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 2233) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6913
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
5.52% Terrible
Lighting 5.23
Reflection 7.19
Parallax 5.16
4% 5.86 fps
MRender 7.43
Gravity 5.97
Splatting 14
8% 9.12 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.52%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-000L7 256GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV22L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 290 310 319 320 315 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 414
Write 332
Mixed 341
SusWrite 312
79% 350 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 89.6
4K Mixed 50.1
170% 59.5 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 338
255% 341 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 104%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD 20GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
64.1% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 21.6
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 16
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20FAS20W00 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20FAS20W00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback