Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4030U 24,177 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Memory 65.4 1-Core 53.8 2-Core 79.2 43% 66.1 Pts	4-Core 141 8-Core 115 18% 128 Pts	64-Core 118 7% 118 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 380D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	2.79% Terrible	Lighting 3.1 Reflection 5.3 Parallax 5.7 2% 4.7 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 2 Splatting 4.2 3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.79% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Jaster JS600-128 128GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q1205B SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 60 67 67 61 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	Read 464 Write 208 Mixed 248 SusWrite 68.9 54% 247 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 62.9 4K Mixed 14.7 87% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 25 48% 98.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMT3170EB68F9W1600 Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 15.9 48% 17 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 13.1 30% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 113 36% 113 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	11x
Iris Pro HD 5100 (Mobile 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 4,565 samples	1x

SSD
CS900 480GBPNY $42Bench 79%, 17,946 samples	3x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	2x
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	2x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 12GBHynixBench 40%, 286 samples	2x
KRE-D3S1600M/8G RMT3190ME76F8F1600 10GBUnknownBench 38%, 2 samples	2x
78.C2GCZ.B730C 78.C2GCZ.AU30C 16GBUnknownBench 45%, 2 samples	2x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $42