Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '17 at 01:45
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$247
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 157
2-Core 264
97% 172 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 854
82% 675 Pts
64-Core 856
53% 856 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2815 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 152
Parallax 129
122% 144 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 141
Splatting 110
98% 121 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 111%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
465GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 410
Mixed 420
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 50.3
183% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 118
143% 253 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 116%
Great: 134%
FCCT480M500SSD1 480GB
188GB free
Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 421
Mixed 450
101% 454 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 30.7
138% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 58.4
116% 232 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 101%
Great: 99%
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
172GB free
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 460
Write 411
Mixed 438
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 29.4
136% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 75.9
125% 238 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 101%
Nvme WDC WDS512G1X0C- 512GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 1,580
Write 241
Mixed 204
144% 675 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 14.9
127% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 596
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 44.2
146% 325 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 134%
Great: 153%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
330GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 66.2
Write 73.7
Mixed 76.4
55% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.25
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 69%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
116GB free
Firmware: GM4OA52A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 74.1
Write 72.3
Mixed 74.1
56% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.31
84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$57
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.8% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 16.4
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 18.5
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 55.2
72% 55.2 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270E GAMING Builds (Compare 6,663 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $783
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback