Asrock X570 Taichi Razer Edition

Performance Results


Gaming 113% UFO	Desktop 101% UFO	Workstation 115% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	484% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X570 Taichi Razer Edition (all builds)
Memory	60.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220517
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 14 '22 at 16:19
Run Duration	641 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$285 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	95.3% Outstanding	Memory 83.7 1-Core 151 2-Core 297 96% 177 Pts	4-Core 573 8-Core 1,026 96% 800 Pts	64-Core 1,494 92% 1,494 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 95.3% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Gigabyte(1458 4074) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3925 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.96 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Lighting 158 Reflection 174 Parallax 151 129% 161 fps	MRender 156 Gravity 107 Splatting 104 98% 122 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$106 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 921GB free Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1753 2563 2858 3046 2306 1685 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	387% Outstanding	Read 2768 Write 2,614 Mixed 2,892 SusWrite 2,369 600% 2,660 MB/s	4K Read 78.4 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 91.3 294% 93.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,223 DQ Write 552 DQ Mixed 693 566% 823 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 387% Great: 488%
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB 44,185 User benchmarks, average bench 430% 841GB free (System drive) Firmware: 614900WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 4216 4202 4217 2033 1686 1671 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	484% Outstanding	Read 4,114 Write 4,108 Mixed 3,182 SusWrite 3,004 810% 3602 MB/s	4K Read 78.4 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 88.1 302% 99.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,378 DQ Write 561 DQ Mixed 676 578% 872 MB/s
Poor: 264% ↑ This bench: 484% Great: 573%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$106 276,089 User benchmarks, average bench 394% 895GB free Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 3034 3059 3052 2147 1714 1722 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	398% Outstanding	Read 2,889 Write 2,597 Mixed 2,950 SusWrite 2,455 614% 2,723 MB/s	4K Read 78.3 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 93.6 299% 95.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,210 DQ Write 556 DQ Mixed 636 538% 801 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 398% Great: 488%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$120 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2.5TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 181 180 177 180 179 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 174 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 179 108% 148 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.6 205% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 113%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$120 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3.5TB free Firmware: 81.H SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 204 202 194 206 201 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 201 Write 195 Mixed 74.1 SusWrite 200 122% 167 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 0.5 218% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 113%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$120 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3.5TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 201 200 195 201 200 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 205 Write 204 Mixed 86.8 SusWrite 199 127% 174 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 0.7 232% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 113%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$120 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3.5TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 202 183 207 191 204 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 152 Write 150 Mixed 77.3 SusWrite 196 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 0.6 215% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 113%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$120 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3.5TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 202 198 198 200 202 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 204 Write 203 Mixed 89.9 SusWrite 200 127% 174 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.8 212% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 113%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$120 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2.5TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 185 184 184 186 183 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 198 Mixed 83.9 SusWrite 184 119% 163 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 0.5 206% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 113%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 741GB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 128 129 129 132 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	71.6% Very good	Read 120 Write 125 Mixed 59 SusWrite 129 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 588GB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 123 126 125 125 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	79.7% Very good	Read 152 Write 152 Mixed 60.7 SusWrite 125 89% 122 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 264% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 109%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 8TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 791GB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 38 40 41 41 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 110 Write 117 Mixed 72.4 SusWrite 38.4 62% 84.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 1 209% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 73%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 6TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 859GB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 36 38 40 41 41 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	34.7% Below average	Read 80.3 Write 110 Mixed 72.3 SusWrite 38.8 56% 75.2 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.6 243% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 72%
Jmicron Generic DISK02 6TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 739GB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 36 38 40 41 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Read 35.2 Write 72.1 Mixed 94.4 SusWrite 38.9 46% 60.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.6 239% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 67%
Jmicron Generic DISK03 6TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 36 38 40 41 41 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 70.2 Write 84.5 Mixed 70.4 SusWrite 38.8 49% 66 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.5 222% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 58%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 6TB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 53 56 57 58 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Read 56.3 Write 87.1 Mixed 59.9 SusWrite 53.9 48% 64.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 0.5 163% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 107%
Jmicron Generic DISK01 6TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 964GB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 53 56 57 58 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 71.6 Write 95.7 Mixed 86.1 SusWrite 53.9 58% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.6 201% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 72%
Jmicron Generic DISK02 6TB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 994GB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 53 56 57 58 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Read 121 Write 133 Mixed 101 SusWrite 53.9 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.9 465% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 67%
Jmicron Generic DISK03 6TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1TB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 53 56 57 58 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Read 153 Write 153 Mixed 88.8 SusWrite 53.9 83% 112 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.8 276% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 58%
Toshiba HDWG180 8TB 513 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 1TB free Firmware: 0603 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 173 174 174 176 172 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	97.6% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 171 Mixed 55 SusWrite 173 103% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.1 183% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 876GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 170 175 174 175 175 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 51.6 Write 88.7 Mixed 66 SusWrite 172 70% 94.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.5 206% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 133 137 133 135 137 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Read 52.2 Write 102 Mixed 73.6 SusWrite 134 67% 90.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.6 213% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GB 1,159 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	MC Read 40.6 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 40.1 103% 35.9 GB/s	SC Read 29.8 SC Write 27.1 SC Mixed 41.8 94% 32.9 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 143%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570 Taichi Razer Edition Builds (Compare 301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 191%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 210%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi Razer Edition

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	73x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	67x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $158Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	66x

GPU
RX 6900-XTAMD $1,000Bench 195%, 16,057 samples	35x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	33x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	28x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	31x
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TBBench 430%, 44,185 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	14x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x16GBCorsairBench 108%, 1,159 samples	20x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,366

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16