MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive386% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 94% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D25
MotherboardMSI PRO Z690-A DDR4  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '22 at 14:56
Run Duration299 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 94%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600K-$159
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 207
2-Core 414
125% 238 Pts
4-Core 792
8-Core 1,368
131% 1,080 Pts
64-Core 1837
114% 1837 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 120%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 770
MSI(1462 7D25) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
8.12% Terrible
Lighting 9.6
Reflection 14.6
Parallax 11.9
8% 12 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 8
9% 11 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.12%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 PRO 250GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2416 2505 394 347 377 393 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
386% Outstanding
Read 2,950
Write 2,522
Mixed 2,369
SusWrite 1,072
499% 2,228 MB/s
4K Read 84
4K Write 257
4K Mixed 128
428% 156 MB/s
DQ Read 1,766
DQ Write 1,367
DQ Mixed 1,560
1,169% 1,564 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 386%
Great: 386%
Nvme WDC WDS500G2B0C-00PXH0 500GB
414GB free
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 742 239 241 242 241 243 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,506
Write 1,722
Mixed 558
SusWrite 325
229% 1,028 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 189
4K Mixed 55.6
232% 94.9 MB/s
DQ Read 995
DQ Write 701
DQ Mixed 870
643% 855 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 188%
Great: 252%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
233GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 489 489 398 299 300 298 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 423
Write 426
Mixed 395
SusWrite 379
92% 406 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 32.1
136% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 339
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 128%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
175GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 428 416 331 333 334 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 430
Write 419
Mixed 376
SusWrite 378
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 45.6
154% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 341
257% 345 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 104%
Great: 128%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 360 360 359 358 360 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 323
Write 323
Mixed 136
SusWrite 358
208% 285 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 1.4
782% 6.73 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 196%
Great: 262%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 42.7
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 38.1
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.1
SC Write 42.7
SC Mixed 32
97% 33.9 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 112%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRO Z690-A DDR4(MS-7D25) Builds (Compare 19,651 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 203%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO Z690-A DDR4 - $209

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $910
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback