HP 240 G8 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 240 G8 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 868C
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210202
Uptime9.5 Days
Run DateJun 14 '22 at 14:08
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 209
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 299
8-Core 299
40% 299 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
HP(103C 868C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
6.34% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 7.5
6% 7.33 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 10
8% 9.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.34%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0A 256GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 760
Write 828
Mixed 760
175% 783 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 72.5
250% 89.5 MB/s
DQ Read 753
DQ Write 587
DQ Mixed 446
394% 595 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 183%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
17GB free
Firmware: SBFKP1A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 222 128 75 211 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 251
Write 106
Mixed 298
SusWrite 178
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 29.8
111% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 207
183% 274 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 100%
USB Flash Disk 1GB
0GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 15.5
Write 13.4
Mixed 10.7
16% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
44% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-013.A00G Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 26.5
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 24.8
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 240 G8 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 738 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 240 G8 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback