TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Precision 3510

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemDell Precision 3510  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 00D152
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display640 x 480 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180820
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJun 14 '22 at 07:27
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 196
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 361
49% 364 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 73.5%
 Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Dell(1028 06E0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1338
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
5.51% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 7.2
5% 6.97 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 9.9
7% 8.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 5.51%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4D1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 828 631 633 635 409 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 1,754
Write 1,233
Mixed 857
SusWrite 535
243% 1,095 MB/s
4K Read 56.6
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 78
269% 97 MB/s
DQ Read 1,098
DQ Write 720
DQ Mixed 795
624% 871 MB/s
Poor: 126% ↑
This bench: 227%
 Great: 259%
AI Mass Storage 32GB
23GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 14 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
8.55% Terrible
Read 29.7
Write 13.7
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 14.7
19% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 8.55%
 Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 22.9
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 20.7
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 68%
 Great: 76%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Precision 3510 Builds (Compare 628 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision 3510

CPU
Core i7-6820HQIntelBench 60%, 33,920 samples432x
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples70x
Core i5-6440HQIntelBench 66%, 4,172 samples51x
GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples581x
HD P530 (Server Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 5,499 samples29x
Radeon R9 M360AMDBench 9%, 1,374 samples11x
SSD
X400 M.2 2280 256GBSandiskBench 66%, 11,716 samples10x
hynix SC308 SATA 512GBSKBench 78%, 1,969 samples10x
1100 SATA 512GBMicronBench 80%, 5,508 samples10x
RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples84x
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 38%, 45,898 samples62x
16ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 1x8GBMicronBench 39%, 4,454 samples51x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback