Asus H110M-E/M.2

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-E/M.2 (all builds)
Memory	0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160511
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 13 '22 at 20:08
Run Duration	253 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	58%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G4400-$45 36,432 User benchmarks, average bench 47% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Memory 69.3 1-Core 65.6 2-Core 59.6 45% 64.8 Pts	4-Core 102 8-Core 105 14% 104 Pts	64-Core 157 10% 157 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.95 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.6% Poor	Lighting 37.4 Reflection 41.8 Parallax 38.8 30% 39.3 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 38.8 Splatting 27.9 28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78 26,547 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 134GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS131122 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 152 100 164 168 139 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	47.4% Average	Read 261 Write 351 Mixed 294 SusWrite 143 59% 262 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 37.1 4K Mixed 10.7 62% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 179 148% 214 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 97%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71 17,356 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 885GB free Firmware: JKAOA3EA SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 82 45 66 107 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	28.9% Poor	Read 31.4 Write 13.7 Mixed 16.2 SusWrite 69.1 24% 32.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 128% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS4G4D240FSE.M8FADM 1x4GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 10.3 31% 10.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 8.2 25% 8.67 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-E/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-E/M.2

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	215x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	189x
Core i3-7100Intel $40Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	168x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	176x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	171x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	109x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	88x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	30x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	28x

RAM
CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x16GBGEILBench 73%, 565 samples	56x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $31Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	34x
9905678-023.A00G 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 4,415 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $157

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16