Lenovo 20C600LFMC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20C600LFMC  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20C600LFMC
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20141212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '22 at 20:04
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4712MQ
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 93.7
2-Core 154
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 460
48% 384 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 502A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.14% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 6.8
3% 5.5 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.14%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3B00101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 414 405 381 417 411 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 453
Write 372
Mixed 379
SusWrite 405
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 22.9
107% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 109
119% 191 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 85%
Great: 102%
Transcend TS128GMTS400S 128GB
76GB free
Firmware: P1225CH1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 148 149 148 149 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 427
Write 149
Mixed 195
SusWrite 144
50% 229 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 28.6
113% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 151
126% 185 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
32.2% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 8.9
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.3
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20C600LFMC Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20C600LFMC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback