Asus P7Q57-M DO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics45.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
24 months ago, 22 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P7Q57-M DO  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '22 at 10:17
Run Duration406 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 132
56% 93.8 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 196
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 2188) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.5% Average
Lighting 57.3
Reflection 56.9
Parallax 53.4
47% 55.9 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 51.6
Splatting 46.4
43% 53.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 46%
Intel HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)
Asus(1043 8383) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.82% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.82%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 55 57 59 56 44 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.1% Below average
Read 198
Write 198
Mixed 163
SusWrite 53.9
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 21.3
79% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 27.5
DQ Write 86
DQ Mixed 37.1
34% 50.2 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
227GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 81 67 22 94 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 91
Write 88.3
Mixed 63.1
SusWrite 75.7
59% 79.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$49
28GB free
Firmware: 3.AAA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 60 60 61 58 51 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 60.8
Write 62
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 57.1
40% 54.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
29.6% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 12.2
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7Q57-M DO Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7Q57-M DO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback