Huananzhi X79-6M INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset
Performance Results
| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Huananzhi X79-6M INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180424 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 13 '22 at 04:13 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | THA-User |
| Background CPU | 57% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
|
63.3%
Good
|
57% 94.7 Pts
|
46% 387 Pts
|
49% 796 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.5%
Poor
|
29% 37.8 fps
|
27% 34 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03070103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 42 43 36 33 MB/s
|
34.1%
Below average
|
20% 90.7 MB/s
|
66% 25.2 MB/s
|
52% 80.2 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT31GR7CFR4A 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
45.9%
Average
|
48% 16.7 GB/s
|
29% 10.2 GB/s
|
46% 87.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X79-6M INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 18 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Huananzhi X79-6M INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-2660 0IntelBench 63%, 1,318 samples | 4x |
| Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 3x |
| Xeon E5-2643 0Intel $1,040Bench 69%, 1,000 samples | 2x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 2x |
| GeForce GTX 1060 3GBNvidiaBench 52%, 5,957 samples | 2x |
| GTX 950Nvidia $100Bench 26%, 111,509 samples | 2x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 114% - Outstanding | Total price: $117 |