Transource MIR-A-ODT-MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics62.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemTransource MIR-A-ODT-MT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK H110M-R
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '22 at 16:22
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 205
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 407
55% 408 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$250
Nvidia(10DE 2507) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
62.1% Good
Lighting 78.9
Reflection 80.7
Parallax 87.8
64% 82.5 fps
MRender 83
Gravity 70
Splatting 62.9
58% 72 fps
Poor: 69%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ABA050V 500GB
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU1OA720
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 89 93 97 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 97
Write 89.9
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 92.2
54% 75.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
20GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 120 121 120 121 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 81
Write 79.3
Mixed 59.6
SusWrite 120
62% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 21.7
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 19.1
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 71%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MIR-A-ODT-MT Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

System: Transource MIR-A-ODT-MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $606
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback