MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B09
Motherboard	MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) (all builds)
Memory	56.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170906
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 09 '17 at 16:50
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 67.7 1-Core 112 2-Core 225 74% 135 Pts	4-Core 450 8-Core 890 79% 670 Pts	64-Core 2,297 142% 2,297 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 8592) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	105% Outstanding	Lighting 136 Reflection 149 Parallax 139 111% 141 fps	MRender 117 Gravity 133 Splatting 110 97% 120 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 200GB free Firmware: O1217A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 633 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 198 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 105 (A3) Unknown 100 100 41 (A4) Unknown 100 100 18887 (A5) Unknown 100 100 27 (A6) Unknown 100 100 3 (A7) Unknown 100 100 9 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 15 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 31 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 74497 (F2) Unknown 100 100 130051 (F5) Unknown 100 100 75548	87.9% Excellent	Read 486 Write 386 Mixed 384 93% 418 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 63.9 4K Mixed 32.4 116% 41.1 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 71 89% 160 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 18443 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1149 (B1) Unknown 90 90 110 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 57 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 545 (EB) Unknown 99 99 185 (F1) Unknown 99 99 65477754496
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 733GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 71 (03) Spinup time 132 132 21493776670 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3217 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 13434 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 632 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 3463 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 3463 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 176094904358 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	84.5% Excellent	Read 143 Write 153 Mixed 154 113% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.22 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.15 44% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB 2,982 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	151% Outstanding	MC Read 62.1 MC Write 59.4 MC Mixed 60.4 173% 60.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 36.4 SC Mixed 24 72% 25.3 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 151% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	124x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	43x
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD $110Bench 76%, 7,071 samples	37x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	38x
RTX 2080Nvidia $391Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	19x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	15x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	13x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $249Bench 279%, 18,356 samples	13x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 96%, 10,311 samples	12x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	9x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 8x8GBUnknownBench 160%, 29 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $753

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16