Asus P5QL/EPU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics24.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5QL/EPU  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090720
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 10 '22 at 21:41
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
41.9% Average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 40.4
2-Core 61.7
38% 55.5 Pts
4-Core 112
8-Core 132
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8555) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.1% Poor
Lighting 28.8
Reflection 41.6
Parallax 23.9
24% 31.4 fps
MRender 35.5
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 28
25% 31.3 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
46GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 58 58 57 55 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 60.5
Write 62.4
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 56.4
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 59%
JMicron 512GB
267GB free
Firmware: 4102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.6% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 31.8
Mixed 32.1
SusWrite 19
22% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 4.1
657% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 26%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
820GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 16 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 21.6
Write 20.3
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 16.3
28% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 5.5
17% 5.83 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5QL/EPU Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QL/EPU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback