Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus STRIX H270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory45.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '22 at 19:18
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 89.2
1-Core 128
2-Core 256
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 701
70% 572 Pts
64-Core 699
43% 699 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R9 290X
AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Lighting 66
Reflection 71.1
Parallax 90.3
54% 75.8 fps
MRender 62.1
Gravity 63.2
Splatting 44
45% 56.4 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP S700 250GB-$31
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0509A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 59 58 71 59 59 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 460
Mixed 437
SusWrite 96
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 39.5
196% 75.7 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 55.2
112% 224 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 98%
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 512GB
86GB free
Firmware: VB411D56
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,782
Write 1,394
Mixed 1,392
408% 1,856 MB/s
4K Read 59.3
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 84.5
294% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,227
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 123
262% 563 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 309%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
630GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 110 111 110 112 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 120
Write 120
Mixed 77.1
SusWrite 110
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 84%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
86GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 54 53 54 54 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 67.1
Write 48.1
Mixed 54
SusWrite 52.9
41% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 54%
Hitachi HTS541010A7E630 1TB
37GB free
Firmware: SE0OA4G0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 57 58 58 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 53.1
Write 60.6
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 57.3
35% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 60%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
637GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 10 10 10 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Read 39.3
Write 12
Mixed 19.1
SusWrite 10.4
15% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
74% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 67%
SanDisk Ultra 16GB
3GB free, PID 5590, Sandisk MDUAL
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 4.3 5 9.2 9.1 9.6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 126
Write 42.6
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 11.8
67% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.7
239% 4.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G Corsair CMK16GX4M1B3000C15 KHX2400C15/8G Corsair CMK16GX4M1B3000C15 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.5% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 23.9
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 24.2
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,826 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $762
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback