Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 136%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive315% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170822
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 09 '17 at 08:31
Run Duration103 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Memory 85.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 287
94% 172 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 1148
101% 859 Pts
64-Core 1,389
86% 1,389 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
MSI(1462 3604) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Lighting 199
Reflection 211
Parallax 205
162% 205 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 193
Splatting 130
123% 153 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 139%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
906GB free
Firmware: CXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 2,127
Write 1,980
Mixed 1,724
433% 1,944 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 71.4
239% 84.1 MB/s
DQ Read 722
DQ Write 375
DQ Mixed 244
262% 447 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 305%
Great: 363%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 2,608
Write 1,810
Mixed 1,865
464% 2,095 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 70.5
247% 89 MB/s
DQ Read 723
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 229
252% 435 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 315%
Great: 353%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 58.5
MC Mixed 31.2
115% 40.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 10
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 101%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 Builds (Compare 217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Gaming 9 - $500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,517
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback