Gigabyte GA-B560M AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive195% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B560M AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211103
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 10 '22 at 00:48
Run Duration308 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 243
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 742
72% 594 Pts
64-Core 869
54% 869 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
MSI(1462 3352) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.3% Below average
Lighting 42.3
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 38.8
34% 40.6 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 41.4
Splatting 27.2
28% 35.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1034 1026 1039 1034 1038 1012 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
195% Outstanding
Read 1032
Write 1,029
Mixed 948
SusWrite 1,030
228% 1,010 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 60.6
209% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 799
DQ Mixed 511
412% 566 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 195%
Great: 253%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
398GB free
Firmware: 411030WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 258 257 256 258 256 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 385
Mixed 259
SusWrite 260
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 38.8
144% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 220
197% 300 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 95%
Great: 111%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: UG2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 243 210 214 213 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 445
Write 389
Mixed 312
SusWrite 239
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 15.5
72% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 31.7
46% 86.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 61%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
112GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 368 372 372 370 358 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 373
Mixed 337
SusWrite 368
89% 395 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 79.5
4K Mixed 37.9
131% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 196
174% 260 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 103%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
233GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 286 285 286 286 286 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 476
Mixed 410
SusWrite 306
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 52.2
172% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 353
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
404GB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1031 1042 1037 982 81 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
179% Outstanding
Read 1,031
Write 980
Mixed 954
SusWrite 706
206% 918 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 59.7
206% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 997
DQ Mixed 509
441% 632 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 179%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.M8FR BL8G30C15U4W.M8FE1 CT8G4DFRA32A.M8FR BL8G30C15U4W.M8FE1 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80.2% Excellent
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 24
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 24.4
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B560M AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 3,087 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B560M AORUS ELITE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback