TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-B450M DS3H V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450M DS3H V2  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '22 at 23:04
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 82.5
1-Core 125
2-Core 251
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 497
66% 497 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑
This bench: 84.3%
 Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.98
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34% Below average
Lighting 39.6
Reflection 38.1
Parallax 51.3
32% 43 fps
MRender 54
Gravity 47
Splatting 38.6
37% 46.5 fps
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 34%
 Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 91 52 40 38 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 469
Write 273
Mixed 55
SusWrite 67
47% 216 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 6.2
68% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 27.5
DQ Mixed 50
45% 72.7 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 45.6%
 Great: 82%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 498GB
141GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1150 769 427 406 371 413 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 67% Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
717GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 113 111 109 103 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
64% Good
Read 115
Write 111
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 108
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 64%
 Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4BL.8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 44.8
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 38.8
120% 42.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 36.2
SC Mixed 30.9
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 68% ↑
This bench: 113%
 Great: 107%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-B450M DS3H V2 Builds (Compare 3,761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450M DS3H V2

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples843x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples309x
Ryzen 5 5600GAMD  $125Bench 86%, 14,368 samples270x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples290x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples185x
GTX 1650Nvidia  $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples182x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples134x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples102x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD  $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples82x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples184x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples132x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples130x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback