Asrock 880GMH/USB3.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive40.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 880GMH/USB3.  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 09 '22 at 06:49
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 840-$150
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Memory 70.5
1-Core 47
2-Core 95.5
45% 71 Pts
4-Core 191
8-Core 190
26% 190 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4250
ASRock(1849 9715) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 4.5
1% 2.13 fps
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 167 133 165 160 187 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.2% Average
Read 206
Write 190
Mixed 155
SusWrite 162
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 19.9
63% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 23.8
DQ Write 78.1
DQ Mixed 31.9
30% 44.6 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 104%
Kingston DataTravelerMini 4GB
3GB free, PID 1602
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 10 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
7.28% Terrible
Read 24.7
Write 7.5
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 10.7
15% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.28%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
30.1% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 11.3
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.6
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 880GMH/USB3. Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 880GMH/USB3.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback