Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-K R2.0  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210709
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJun 09 '22 at 04:57
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 125
2-Core 230
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 452
61% 454 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 11E6) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 15.8
Reflection 17.5
Parallax 15
13% 16.1 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 17.2
Splatting 15.8
11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 256GB SSD 256GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 34 59 57 43 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 437
Write 156
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 57.9
40% 185 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 2.1
31% 73 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KingSpec 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
43.4% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 12.2
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.2
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H310M-K R2.0 Builds (Compare 7,169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-K R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback