| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 8.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| System | Hp-pavilion KJ385AA-ABA a6433w (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK Benicia |
| Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20080131 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 09 '22 at 04:33 |
| Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 41% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
41.9%
Average
|
35% 52 Pts
|
17% 125 Pts
|
7% 119 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ATI FirePro V5800 (FireGL V)
Dell(1028 2306) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1010
|
8.88%
Terrible
|
10% 11.3 fps
|
7% 8.83 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
233GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 236 235 202 216 239 MB/s
|
68.6%
Good
|
53% 237 MB/s
|
116% 37.5 MB/s
|
134% 184 MB/s
|
|
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.CHN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 53 55 58 58 60 MB/s
|
29.7%
Poor
|
36% 48.7 MB/s
|
140% 1.07 MB/s
| |
|
WD WD10EADX-00TDHB0 1TB
732GB free
Firmware: 77.04D77
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 53 52 49 42 MB/s
|
35.3%
Below average
|
46% 62 MB/s
|
136% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
17.1%
Very poor
|
16% 5.47 GB/s
|
14% 4.73 GB/s
|
33% 120 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical KJ385AA-ABA a6433w Builds (Compare 8 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Hp-pavilion KJ385AA-ABA a6433w
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 4x |
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 3x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| FirePro V5800 (FireGL V)ATIBench 9%, 444 samples | 4x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 3x |
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 35% - Below average | Total price: $195 |