TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Precision Rack 7910

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision Rack 7910  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 01J90F
Memory42.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '22 at 21:45
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4
CPU1, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 57.3
1-Core 58.9
2-Core 80.1
42% 65.4 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 459
42% 351 Pts
64-Core 2,591
160% 2,591 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 51.2%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.25
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Lighting 39
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 37.3
32% 39 fps
MRender 51.1
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 39.3
34% 42.5 fps
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 32.7%
 Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$48
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 449
Write 329
Mixed 330
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 25
84% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 254
211% 304 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 00AD00B300AD HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 00AD00B300AD HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 00AD00B300AD HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 00AD00B300AD HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 00AD00B300AD HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 00AD063200AD HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 00AD063200AD HMA451R7MFR8N-TF... 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
161% Outstanding
MC Read 67.1
MC Write 65.1
MC Mixed 73.2
196% 68.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.7
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 117% ↑
This bench: 161%
 Great: 184%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Precision Rack 7910 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: Dell Precision Rack 7910

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v41stBench 65%, 987 samples5x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v31stBench 63%, 481 samples2x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples2x
GPU
Quadro M6000 24GBNvidiaBench 75%, 361 samples3x
Quadro M5000NvidiaBench 50%, 1,540 samples3x
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 131%, 1,749 samples3x
SSD
1100 SATA 512GBMicronBench 80%, 5,508 samples3x
PM871a 2.5 7mm 1024GBSamsungBench 103%, 121 samples3x
MKNSSDTR512GB-3D 512GBMushkinBench 80%, 103 samples2x
RAM
HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 2x16GBUnknownBench 45%, 33 samples2x
HMA81GR7MFR8N-UH 8x8GBUnknownBench 91%, 8 samples2x
HMA82GR7AFR8N-UH 8x16GBUnknownBench 108%, 31 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback