Dell Precision Rack 7910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision Rack 7910  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 01J90F
Memory42.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '22 at 16:37
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4
CPU1, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 61.4
1-Core 52.9
2-Core 110
45% 74.9 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 426
38% 322 Pts
64-Core 2,555
158% 2,555 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 51%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.78
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.3% Below average
Lighting 38.6
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 36.5
32% 38.6 fps
MRender 50.5
Gravity 37
Splatting 39
34% 42.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$48
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 362 367 367 363 369 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 453
Write 379
Mixed 334
SusWrite 366
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 28.3
96% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 260
210% 296 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 00AD00B300AD HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 00AD00B300AD HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 00AD00B300AD HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 00AD00B300AD HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 00AD00B300AD HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 00AD063200AD HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 00AD063200AD HMA451R7MFR8N-TF... 48GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
165% Outstanding
MC Read 70.9
MC Write 66.4
MC Mixed 72.4
200% 69.9 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 9
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 165%
Great: 184%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Rack 7910 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: Dell Precision Rack 7910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback