Google Zako

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
SystemGoogle Zako  (all builds)
MotherboardGOOGLE Zako
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190104
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 08 '22 at 12:40
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600U
, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 74.6
1-Core 74
2-Core 134
57% 94.2 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 214
29% 214 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Device(1AE0 C000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.49% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 3.5
2% 2.8 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.9
3% 3.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.49%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M.2 128GB 128GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 299 342 306 195 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 434
Write 330
Mixed 327
SusWrite 250
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 19.2
108% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 40.1
82% 161 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown (0) None 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.3% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 15.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 17.1
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 91.2
44% 91.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Zako Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Google Zako

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback