Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 137%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics176% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '22 at 22:36
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 81.4
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 202
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 716
66% 554 Pts
64-Core 989
61% 989 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
176% Outstanding
Lighting 245
Reflection 246
Parallax 318
199% 269 fps
MRender 298
Gravity 236
Splatting 173
186% 236 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 176%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HUSMR7616BHP301 1.5TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: KNGND100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 921 973 990 992 992 986 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 574
Write 816
Mixed 724
SusWrite 976
176% 772 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 56.5
171% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 706
DQ Write 555
DQ Mixed 653
482% 638 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 165%
Great: 230%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
930GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 187 188 188 188 187 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 339
Write 291
Mixed 288
SusWrite 187
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 45.2
135% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 183
148% 211 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 126%
Micron_M500_MTFDDAK960MAV 960GB
307GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 187 187 187 187 186 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62% Good
Read 320
Write 300
Mixed 258
SusWrite 186
60% 266 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 29.5
89% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 147
129% 193 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62%
Great: 98%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
21GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 284 317 294 281 210 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 405
Write 343
Mixed 291
SusWrite 279
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 24.5
94% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 157
127% 185 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 86%
Intel 520 Series 480GB-$249
244GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 394 387 394 400 397 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 441
Write 423
Mixed 359
SusWrite 390
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 21.1
4K Mixed 22.7
79% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 305
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 243
179% 240 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
97.3% Outstanding
MC Read 43.6
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 35.8
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.2
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 97.3%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,078
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback