Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5660 2,343 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 84.5 1-Core 78.3 2-Core 157 64% 107 Pts	4-Core 288 8-Core 455 46% 372 Pts	64-Core 1,022 63% 1,022 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Sapphire(174B E308) CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Lighting 46.1 Reflection 47.1 Parallax 56.5 38% 49.9 fps	MRender 46.1 Gravity 43.6 Splatting 33 33% 40.9 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 143 110 56 37 78 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.4% Below average	Read 152 Write 192 Mixed 151 SusWrite 101 34% 149 MB/s	4K Read 14.3 4K Write 19.6 4K Mixed 13.9 50% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 51.5 DQ Mixed 52.2 53% 89.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 88%
WD Re 2TB (2012)-$25 5,893 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 1.5TB free Firmware: 00.0NS00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 143 143 143 143 144 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	79.5% Very good	Read 133 Write 128 Mixed 77.9 SusWrite 143 88% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1.2 220% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 90%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$70 11,781 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 269GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 94 91 95 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 86.6 Write 95.7 Mixed 58.3 SusWrite 94 62% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-G7 ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-G7 ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-G7 ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-G7 ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-G7 ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-G7 58GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	47.1% Average	MC Read 19.9 MC Write 15.7 MC Mixed 16.8 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 7.1 22% 7.6 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	319x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	189x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	180x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16