Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite S45-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive15.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba Satellite S45-A  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA VFKTA
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130406
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 07 '22 at 14:43
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3337U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
41.7% Average
Memory 61.7
1-Core 48.6
2-Core 86.9
41% 65.7 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 150
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M
Toshiba(1179 FA02) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2606
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
5.59% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 8.3
6% 7.4 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 8.3
5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.59%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 30 30 31 34 18 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.5% Very poor
Read 74
Write 28.6
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 36.8
10% 44.1 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 6.1
32% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 23.3
DQ Write 14.3
DQ Mixed 15.7
12% 17.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 102%
Generic External 750GB
188GB free, PID 0840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 35 37 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 37.2
Write 36.6
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 36.2
44% 33 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Kingston 9904342-013.A00G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 13.7
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite S45-A Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite S45-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback