Huananzhi X79-ZD3 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 21 months ago.
MotherboardHuananzhi X79-ZD3 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset  (all builds)
Memory59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180424
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 06 '22 at 18:35
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 66.6
2-Core 176
63% 108 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 653
60% 502 Pts
64-Core 868
54% 868 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
m.2 Smartbuy PS5012-2280 256GB
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM13.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 294 316 312 294 302 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 773
Write 773
Mixed 398
SusWrite 319
126% 566 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 36.8
118% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 442
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 432
314% 409 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 222%
SSD 128GB 128GB
67GB free
Firmware: R0822A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 119 74 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 470
Write 381
Mixed 228
SusWrite 126
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 29.4
4K Mixed 11.8
70% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 25.6
62% 130 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 93%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
330GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 104 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 106
Write 108
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 104
74% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70QH0- M393B2G70QH0- 64GB
1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
98.2% Outstanding
MC Read 40.9
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 36.4
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 11.7
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 75.4
53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79-ZD3 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79-ZD3 INTEL (INTEL Xeon E5/Corei7 DMI2 - C600/C200 Cipset

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback