GPU GWTN156-1

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

System	GPU GWTN156-1 (all builds)
Motherboard	GPU GPU Company
Memory	5.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200825
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 05 '22 at 03:02
Run Duration	334 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	83%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1035G1 53,170 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 69.2 1-Core 118 2-Core 232 76% 140 Pts	4-Core 365 8-Core 458 53% 411 Pts	64-Core 323 20% 323 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 68,603 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1C6C 078B) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	6.48% Terrible	Lighting 6.9 Reflection 8.4 Parallax 8.8 6% 8.03 fps	MRender 11.6 Gravity 7.9 Splatting 10.3 8% 9.93 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.48% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,433 Write 2,215 Mixed 1572 461% 2,073 MB/s	4K Read 60.3 4K Write 134 4K Mixed 81 266% 91.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,015 DQ Write 665 DQ Mixed 798 606% 826 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Foresee 256GB SSD 256GB 1,745 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 58GB free Firmware: V4.7.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 360 412 391 212 147 147 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	77.9% Very good	Read 442 Write 276 Mixed 320 SusWrite 278 74% 329 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 71.7 4K Mixed 23.4 115% 42 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 35.4 74% 149 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 151%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28 4,213 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 19GB free, PID 5580 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 73 75 82 72 66 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Read 213 Write 61.7 Mixed 47.4 SusWrite 74 109% 99 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 10.2 4K Mixed 8.6 685% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 10.9 DQ Write 11.5 DQ Mixed 9.5 755% 10.6 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 93%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB 148 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 30GB free, PID 558b Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 57 35 0.6 39 58 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	40.9% Average	Read 175 Write 127 Mixed 95.2 SusWrite 42.2 135% 110 MB/s	4K Read 4.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.6 130% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 69%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72 6,221 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 42GB free, PID 5580 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 63 77 71 77 66 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	76% Very good	Read 223 Write 176 Mixed 107 SusWrite 69.9 179% 144 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 8.6 4K Mixed 7.4 575% 8.13 MB/s	DQ Read 9.8 DQ Write 10.2 DQ Mixed 7.5 638% 9.17 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 76% Great: 111%
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.0 128GB-$60 1,435 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 103GB free, PID 5588 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 75 77 88 76 79 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Read 224 Write 200 Mixed 164 SusWrite 73.5 213% 165 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 9.7 4K Mixed 6.8 590% 8.1 MB/s	DQ Read 10.4 DQ Write 10.6 DQ Mixed 8.5 688% 9.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 123%
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.0 128GB-$60 1,435 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 103GB free, PID 5588 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 73 78 88 78 68 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	77.8% Very good	Read 221 Write 189 Mixed 41.1 SusWrite 78.5 161% 132 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 8.4 4K Mixed 8.7 627% 9.77 MB/s	DQ Read 12.6 DQ Write 12.6 DQ Mixed 10.4 829% 11.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 123%
SanDisk Extreme Pro USB 3.1 256GB-$43 436 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 222GB free, PID 5588 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 74 88 77 81 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 122%
SDXC Card 256GB 3,434 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 41GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 24 24 26 26 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 26.1 Write 21.9 Mixed 7 SusWrite 25.3 26% 20.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1.3 74% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 2x8GB 3,676 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3733 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	101% Outstanding	MC Read 38.2 MC Write 41.7 MC Mixed 35.3 110% 38.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 35.5 SC Mixed 25.4 72% 25.1 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GWTN156-1 Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: GPU GWTN156-1

CPU
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	100x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	100x

SSD
256GB SSD 256GBForeseeBench 79%, 1,745 samples	88x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	1x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	1x

RAM
2x8GBMicronBench 83%, 3,676 samples	100x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $47	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16