Asrock Z87 Extreme9/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z87 Extreme9/ac  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '22 at 20:52
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 203
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 534
56% 452 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 183
Reflection 178
Parallax 180
149% 180 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 157
Splatting 0.2
82% 115 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 121%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 788 366 365 361 366 370 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 73% Great: 130%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
534GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 472 472 474 470 474 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 460
Mixed 442
SusWrite 472
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 99.3
4K Mixed 59.9
197% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 355
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 126%
Great: 137%
WD Black 4TB (2013)-$182
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 134 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 146
Write 122
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 133
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.7
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 18.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87 Extreme9/ac Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Extreme9/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $275
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback