Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	82.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200 51,169 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 78.8 2-Core 152 63% 105 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 327 36% 286 Pts	64-Core 327 20% 327 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1D82) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 10.17.10.4229 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 250G 250GB 3,453 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 46GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 314 313 310 294 296 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Read 462 Write 443 Mixed 408 SusWrite 307 91% 405 MB/s	4K Read 22.5 4K Write 54.3 4K Mixed 26.3 97% 34.4 MB/s	DQ Read 391 DQ Write 313 DQ Mixed 250 215% 318 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 122%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GB 6,386 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 16.1 50% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 16 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	26x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	13x

SSD
860 EVO 250G 250GBSamsungBench 86%, 3,453 samples	5x
R5SL240G 240GBAMDBench 64%, 128 samples	4x
320 Series 80GBIntel $60Bench 38%, 4,402 samples	2x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	7x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 8,481 samples	6x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 6GBHynixBench 40%, 239 samples	3x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $200

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16