Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_A512DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_A512DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X512DA
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '22 at 12:24
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 66
1-Core 115
2-Core 220
73% 134 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 518
53% 426 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 1821) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 17.8
10% 13.9 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 15
Splatting 11.3
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 895 352 60 66 86 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 1,030
Write 944
Mixed 872
SusWrite 259
174% 776 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 53.9
186% 67.6 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 450
DQ Mixed 401
296% 383 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 132%
Great: 185%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
67% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 21.1
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 23.3
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 67%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_A512DA Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512DA_A512DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback