Positivo POS-MA760GCP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPositivo POS-MA760GCP  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo POS-MA760GCP
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121024
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 04 '22 at 02:05
Run Duration306 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
CPU1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 69.2
1-Core 65.3
2-Core 97.2
49% 77.2 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 222
26% 204 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
EVGA(3842 1300) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.4% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.4
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 0.5
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 0.5
1% 0.9 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.4%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAJ20103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 217 190 217 183 214 MB/s
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.2% Good
Read 243
Write 212
Mixed 223
SusWrite 206
50% 221 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 29
109% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 135
DQ Mixed 108
91% 132 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SH564128FH8N0QHSCR Kingston 9965525-139.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.9% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 14
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 11.6
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical POS-MA760GCP Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo POS-MA760GCP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $96
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback