Asus ProArt X570-CREATOR WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ProArt X570-CREATOR WIFI  (all builds)
Memory53.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220302
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJun 04 '22 at 00:04
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 83.7
1-Core 149
2-Core 265
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 1,031
88% 758 Pts
64-Core 2,199
136% 2,199 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.96
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.9% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 115
Parallax 102
84% 106 fps
MRender 93.5
Gravity 102
Splatting 103
82% 99.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS400T2B0A-00SM50 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 397 394 402 416 420 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 430
Mixed 338
SusWrite 407
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 43.5
138% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 202
153% 206 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 115%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
457GB free
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1398 1426 1430 1441 1438 1439 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
273% Outstanding
Read 1,926
Write 1,406
Mixed 773
SusWrite 1,429
309% 1,383 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 63
234% 87.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,270
DQ Write 404
DQ Mixed 447
432% 707 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 273%
Great: 283%
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$58
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR402 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,711
Write 3,620
Mixed 2,243
710% 3,191 MB/s
4K Read 59.6
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 82.1
270% 94.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,124
DQ Write 850
DQ Mixed 1,010
749% 995 MB/s
Poor: 162% Great: 463%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
854GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 399 404 413 413 413 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 404
Mixed 382
SusWrite 402
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 45.2
151% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 182
141% 194 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 125%
WD Purple Surveillance 4TB (2017)-$71
608GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 110 110 111 110 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 157
Write 150
Mixed 74.1
SusWrite 110
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 123 126 126 127 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 126
Write 118
Mixed 91
SusWrite 125
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4B.16FE BL16G32C16U4BL.M8FB1 BL16G32C16U4B.16FE BL16G32C16U4BL.M8FB1 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
119% Outstanding
MC Read 60.6
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 37.1
127% 44.5 GB/s
SC Read 28.9
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 38.1
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 93%
This bench: 119%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProArt X570-CREATOR WIFI Builds (Compare 414 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 205%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 247%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ProArt X570-CREATOR WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,659
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback