Asus P8Z68-V GEN3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive76.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V GEN3  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJun 01 '22 at 22:25
Run Duration502 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 96.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 220
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 544
56% 454 Pts
64-Core 534
33% 534 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 195 182 226 235 210 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 411
Write 280
Mixed 216
SusWrite 204
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 28.6
116% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 118
130% 225 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 110%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
128GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 83 85 88 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 106
Write 130
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 88.2
72% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 77%
JMicron Tech 500GB
125GB free, PID 0576
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 299 288 286 282 291 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 285
Write 281
Mixed 271
SusWrite 290
386% 282 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 21.8
1,649% 22.9 MB/s
DQ Read 26.3
DQ Write 27.1
DQ Mixed 28.6
1,992% 27.3 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 184%
Great: 200%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBXL 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 04CD F3-14900CL9-4GBXL 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 16GB
1867, 1867, 1867, 1867 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.3% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 20
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.1
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 51.9
77% 51.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V GEN3 Builds (Compare 863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V GEN3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $522
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback