Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	10.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	15.6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15.6GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	13.3 GB free of 15.625 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 01 '22 at 22:13
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Opteron 6220 2 User benchmarks, average bench 35% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.7% Poor	Memory 44 1-Core 25.8 2-Core 42.7 25% 37.5 Pts	4-Core 76 8-Core 92.3 11% 84.2 Pts	64-Core 143 9% 143 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 40%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 215GB 96 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 21 9.9 13 13 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	10.1% Very poor	Read 105 Write 80.9 Mixed 275 SusWrite 13.4 27% 119 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 5.2 16% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x15GB 645 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1 of 1 slots used 15GB DIMM RAM Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 12.2 MC Mixed 15.7 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 6.4 15% 5.13 GB/s	Latency 184 22% 184 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 151%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 127%

UFO

CPU
Gen Intel Core i7-12700K12thBench 99%, 67 samples	5x
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X 24-CoreAMDBench 85%, 74 samples	4x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	4x

SSD
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 960GBCorsairBench 230%, 32,020 samples	4x
SM841 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,284 samples	3x
HARDDISK 86GBQemuBench 42%, 75 samples	3x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16