Asus BM6AE_BM1AE_BP1AE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus BM6AE_BM1AE_BP1AE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK BM6AE_BM1AE_BP1AE
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '22 at 14:36
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 113
2-Core 199
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 565
60% 479 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
MSI(1462 2843) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.47
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Lighting 35.2
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 45.4
29% 37.3 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 44.9
Splatting 33.5
32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Anacomda A1S 120GB SSD
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0810B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 170 172 102 169 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 448
Write 171
Mixed 217
SusWrite 156
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 79.1
4K Mixed 26
102% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 115
94% 130 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 69%
Seagate SkyHawk 8TB (2016)-$170
6.5TB free
Firmware: AV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 231 231 235 234 232 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.7% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 9
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical BM6AE_BM1AE_BP1AE Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus BM6AE_BM1AE_BP1AE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback