Asus BM6AE_BM1AE_BP1AE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive61.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus BM6AE_BM1AE_BP1AE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK BM6AE_BM1AE_BP1AE
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '22 at 09:13
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 195
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 563
62% 492 Pts
64-Core 580
36% 580 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
MSI(1462 2843) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.47
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Lighting 34.6
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 45.3
28% 37 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 45.2
Splatting 33.4
32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Anacomda A1S 120GB SSD
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0810B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 170 121 127 106 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 436
Write 171
Mixed 215
SusWrite 121
52% 236 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 23.6
102% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 114
93% 130 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 69%
Seagate SkyHawk 8TB (2016)-$170
6.5TB free
Firmware: AV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 228 234 234 234 234 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.9% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.2
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 9.3
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical BM6AE_BM1AE_BP1AE Builds (Compare 81 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus BM6AE_BM1AE_BP1AE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback