| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Micro-Star GL62M 7REX |
| Motherboard | MSI MS-16J9 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170711 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 07 '17 at 22:21 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
79.6%
Very good
|
77% 133 Pts
|
54% 402 Pts
|
25% 397 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11C8) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8569
|
33%
Below average
|
34% 36.1 fps
|
30% 37.6 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
43.1%
Average
|
41% 14.5 GB/s
|
36% 12.7 GB/s
|
59% 67.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,777 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples | 2,475x |
| Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples | 1,302x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples | 2,252x |
| GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples | 1,022x |
| GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples | 502x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |