bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive6.79% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory3.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory1.9 GB free of 3.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '22 at 05:10
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
None, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 72
2-Core 70.4
46% 68.8 Pts
4-Core 70.5
8-Core 71.8
10% 71.2 Pts
64-Core 63.8
4% 63.8 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
6.79% Terrible
Read 37.2
Write 37.5
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 22.6
8% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 1
12% 5.17 MB/s
DQ Read 17
DQ Write 14.3
DQ Mixed 7.1
8% 12.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 6.79%
Great: 77%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 8GB
6GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 12 13 12 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.8% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 32.2
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 12.3
6% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 8.2
29% 8.67 MB/s
DQ Read 16.4
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 16.3
12% 16.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 3GB
0, 0 MHz
1024, 2560 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
43.8% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 19.2
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 12.9
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,495 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback