Dell OptiPlex 3010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 3010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 3010  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '22 at 05:02
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 166
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 471
46% 379 Pts
64-Core 476
30% 476 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.1
Reflection 10.4
Parallax 15.3
13% 13.9 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 17.7
Splatting 16.3
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
25GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 89 158 209 193 144 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29% Poor
Read 228
Write 18.4
Mixed 25
SusWrite 135
22% 102 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 4.2
41% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
528GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 64 68 135 154 155 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 138
Write 137
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 108
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
353GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 199 199 199 198 200 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 112
Mixed 82.6
SusWrite 199
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Toshiba MK3265GSX H 320GB
81GB free
Firmware: GJ001Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 60 59 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 53.4
Write 56.6
Mixed 24
SusWrite 58.2
35% 48 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 50%
FUJITSU MHW2160B 160GB
57GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 35 34 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.9% Very poor
Read 35.6
Write 31.5
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 34.5
41% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 16%
TS-RDF5A Transcend 128GB
83GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.5 11 17 14 9.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.69% Terrible
Read 8.7
Write 10.2
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 10.2
22% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
78% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 7.69%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.6
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 15.4
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 3010 Builds (Compare 4,335 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 3010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback