Nexstgo NS14N1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemNexstgo NS14N1  (all builds)
MotherboardNexstgo NS14N1
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '22 at 01:42
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 72.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 198
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 461
53% 411 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Device(1DC2 3107) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.26% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 8.2
6% 7.27 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 10.9
8% 9.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.26%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$35
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 971 888 847 853 859 788 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,316
Write 856
Mixed 907
SusWrite 868
221% 987 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 47.9
179% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 616
DQ Write 447
DQ Mixed 542
402% 535 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 184%
Great: 284%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
72.7% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 21.9
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 24.2
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NS14N1 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Nexstgo NS14N1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback