Intel H55AD17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel H55AD17  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201118
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 31 '22 at 14:42
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 540-$60
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 70.1
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 132
55% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 185
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Nvidia(10DE 1073) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 16
14% 16.7 fps
MRender 22
Gravity 17.8
Splatting 14.7
14% 18.2 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xstar 256GB 256GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 203 207 207 211 210 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.3% Below average
Read 163
Write 107
Mixed 110
SusWrite 205
33% 146 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 24.4
4K Mixed 14.4
57% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 15
DQ Write 24.7
DQ Mixed 18.5
14% 19.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 88%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
862GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 22 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 20.5
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 21.2
19% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.7
171% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 66%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
20GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 13 13 12 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 10.4
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 12.3
23% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.7
155% 3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
29.2% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 12.6
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.3
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H55AD17 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H55AD17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $320
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback