Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 3000G-$52 11,076 User benchmarks, average bench 53% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 80.5 1-Core 108 2-Core 200 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 287 38% 284 Pts	64-Core 282 18% 282 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics 27,821 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 876B) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	5.64% Terrible	Lighting 5.7 Reflection 9.3 Parallax 7.9 5% 7.63 fps	MRender 9.9 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 11.4 8% 9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.64% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB 27,523 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 130 50 111 40 87 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 464 Write 274 Mixed 338 SusWrite 104 66% 295 MB/s	4K Read 34 4K Write 70.9 4K Mixed 6.6 98% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 80.5 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 171 122% 153 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Mushkin MR[ABC]4U360JNNM8G 2x8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 41.4 MC Write 41.5 MC Mixed 36.1 113% 39.7 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 43.6 SC Mixed 28.8 92% 32 GB/s	Latency 79.7 50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	63x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	59x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	58x

RAM
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GBTeamBench 78%, 7,481 samples	38x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	24x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	20x

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $233