Hp-pavilion AY581AA-ABA 300-1120

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHp-pavilion AY581AA-ABA 300-1120  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON JESSE
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100211
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 31 '22 at 07:35
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 605e
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
46.8% Average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 34.8
2-Core 68.9
39% 58 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 139
18% 138 Pts
64-Core 138
8% 138 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200
HP(103C 2A8E) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.63% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.3
0% 0.63 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.63%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 32 33 40 14 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 66.2
Write 1.3
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 26
20% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 43%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
7GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 12 11 11 11 12 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 22.2
Write 11.8
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 11
17% 13.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2
134% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.5% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 11.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.8
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AY581AA-ABA 300-1120 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion AY581AA-ABA 300-1120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback