Hp-pavilion AY581AA-ABA 300-1120

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHp-pavilion AY581AA-ABA 300-1120  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON JESSE
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '22 at 07:10
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 605e
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Memory 51.8
1-Core 34.1
2-Core 69.6
33% 51.8 Pts
4-Core 126
8-Core 129
17% 128 Pts
64-Core 133
8% 133 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200
HP(103C 2A8E) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.3
0% 0.8 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 1.1
1% 0.77 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$27
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9 9.6 11 13 8.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 25.1
Write 15.6
Mixed 16.1
SusWrite 10.3
12% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
51% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 43%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB
7GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 12 12 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 21.3
Write 11
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 11.2
16% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.9
126% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
28.7% Poor
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 11
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AY581AA-ABA 300-1120 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion AY581AA-ABA 300-1120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback