Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra

Performance Results


Gaming 125% UFO	Desktop 100% UFO	Workstation 127% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	287% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
Motherboard	Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra (all builds)
Memory	25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211105
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	May 31 '22 at 04:52
Run Duration	311 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$409 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	94.4% Outstanding	Memory 91.6 1-Core 144 2-Core 287 96% 174 Pts	4-Core 521 8-Core 998 90% 759 Pts	64-Core 1,490 92% 1,490 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX A4000 4,246 User benchmarks, average bench 132% Nvidia(10DE 14AD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 512.78 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	132% Outstanding	Lighting 181 Reflection 198 Parallax 176 148% 185 fps	MRender 191 Gravity 137 Splatting 137 124% 155 fps
Poor: 125% ↑ This bench: 132% Great: 137%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Pm981a NVMe Samsung 512GB 3,592 User benchmarks, average bench 220% 370GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1530 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1238 1304 822 825 820 820 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	287% Outstanding	Read 2,331 Write 2,142 Mixed 1,594 SusWrite 972 394% 1,760 MB/s	4K Read 64.7 4K Write 143 4K Mixed 86.9 285% 98.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,167 DQ Write 891 DQ Mixed 1,002 757% 1,020 MB/s
Poor: 132% ↑ This bench: 287% Great: 298%
Seagate ST3000VX006-1HH166 3TB 758 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2.5TB free Firmware: CV11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 160 161 162 160 162 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Read 153 Write 153 Mixed 79.9 SusWrite 160 100% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 101%
Samsung Flash Drive DUO 64GB 839 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 58GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 73 71 72 75 58 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 113 Write 2.2 Mixed 67.1 SusWrite 69.9 75% 63.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 107% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 35%
Generic External 1TB 2,077 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 13GB free, PID 0840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 21 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Read 35 Write 33.9 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 21.6 38% 29.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.7 117% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 29%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB 6,353 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 175GB free, PID 7000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	23.2% Poor	Read 33.8 Write 37 Mixed 27 SusWrite 20.6 40% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.6 175% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 57%
Seagate USB 1TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 187GB free, PID 2320 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	19.2% Very poor	Read 38.4 Write 33.1 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 36.6 44% 33.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 53%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 478GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 92 91 92 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Read 89.7 Write 89.2 Mixed 34.9 SusWrite 91.3 102% 76.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB 414 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	73.7% Very good	MC Read 28.6 MC Write 27.8 MC Mixed 20.5 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 31.6 SC Mixed 22.9 68% 23.8 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 100%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ULTRA-CF Builds (Compare 7,736 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 150%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra - $172

CPU
Core i9-9900KIntel $409Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	3,337x
Core i7-9700KIntel $263Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2,256x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $292Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	488x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	834x
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	627x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	549x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	691x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	607x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	332x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	302x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	266x
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	246x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,231

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16