Dell Latitude E7240

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Latitude E7240  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 08YF01
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '22 at 13:04
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4310U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 76.5
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 140
60% 98.8 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 200
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Dell(1028 05CA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.78% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 5.1
3% 3.4 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 2
Splatting 4
3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.78%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM10.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 108 193 69 71 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 454
Write 356
Mixed 352
SusWrite 82.9
69% 311 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 24
116% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 9.1
DQ Mixed 2.3
37% 96.8 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 95%
MT-256 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: H190117D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 389 431 402 390 216 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 439
Mixed 407
SusWrite 368
94% 415 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 41.8
158% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 212
167% 226 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 17.1
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E7240 Builds (Compare 1,247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E7240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback